Confessions From the Bottom of A Coffee-Cup
In a late night bookstore
Hey there.

I'm D some people call me Zombar and others Danny or Dan

.

I'm here to live life and be positive. There's a lot in life and I've chosen to treat it like an extended art project that anyone may contribute to.

I am a positive person and so is my blog there's more about me over on my about me page over here:

So you want to get to know me better?

I also have a lovely tags page to help you navigate

{block:SubmissionsEnabled} Submit {/block:SubmissionsEnabled}
"On the other hand, a lot of anti-makeup sentiment– particularly anything that starts talking about how “frivolous” and “shallow” makeup is– is also misogynistic and femmephobic. Makeup is a form of visual art. If making your face beautiful is shallow, so is making a canvas beautiful or a block of marble or a hunk of plastic. If you understand why someone would feel satisfied and happy when they make a gorgeous print, you understand why someone would feel satisfied and happy when their makeup looks perfect. I do not think it is accidental that the form of visual art almost entirely practiced by women is the one that gets accused of frivolity and where the talent exhibited by many of the artists is ignored or denigrated."
Other People’s Makeup Use: None Of Your Business – Ozy Frantz’s Blog (via tinybows)

posted 1 year ago on 23/1/2013 with 16425 notes
via phantomteaparty © ozyfrantz.com
#reblog #quotes

gabnats:

catfromwonder:

Julie Dillon

nice


posted 1 year ago on 22/1/2013 with 52634 notes
via gabnats © catfromwonder
#Astrology Calendar #art #Illustration #fantasy #zodiac #reblog #i had to reblog it from the srouce because of all the HOMESTUCL #qarwegtu
gabnats:

if you don’t love yukiko, you’re wrong

gabnats:

if you don’t love yukiko, you’re wrong


posted 1 year ago on 22/1/2013 with 511 notes
via gabnats © naotolaon
#persona 4 #i love yukiko #reblog

pixelhime:

sparklysloth:

taobaosux:

Galaxy Sailor Uniform 

Yuan 109 ($18 USD)

the skirt is sold here 

($15 USD)

ivE NEVER WANTED ANYTHING MORE IN MY LIFE

I WANT TO BUY ONE RIGHT NOW


posted 1 year ago on 9/1/2013 with 3892 notes
via pixelhime © taobaosux
#reblog #!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #fashion

If I had one night alone with you…

innuendorose:

stridersis:

livinglovelytoday:

diedhigh:

screeching:

DO THIS PLEASE

No one will do this lol

Do it.

HIT ME WITH YOUR BEST SHOT

WHY DON’T YOU HIT ME WITH YOUR BEST SHOT

HIT ME WITH YOUR BEST SHOT

FIRE AWAY

lets go people


posted 1 year ago on 2/1/2013 with 13386 notes
via mysterychase
#message #messages #message me #reblog
comicsfacts:

Merry Christmas folks!
Source

comicsfacts:

Merry Christmas folks!

Source


posted 1 year ago on 25/12/2012 with 936 notes
via mysterychase © comicsfacts
#santa claus #dc #christmas #picture #reblog
irisundone:

sushigrade:

kyrax2:

eschergirls:

thebirdandthebat:

Wow, I’m never buying anything Tony Harris does again. Disgusting.
(Ex Machina, Starman artist: his wikipedia page. Click the image to be taken to the Facebook thread where he posted this.)

Since somebody sent this to me, because it fits some of the themes this blog has touched on in the past, here are my thoughts:
1) I like how he thinks he’s stumbled upon our secret plan, and also that this is some sort of amazing new idea.  I’ve heard this accusation from my geek guy friends going back a decade.  The “you’re just there to get attention because you want to be the big fish in a small pond” accusation to femalef geeks they find attractive, is not new.
2) I like how he’s a mind reader.  Maybe it’s true of some girls, maybe it’s not, how do you know by looking at them?  The only thing you know is how YOU’RE attracted to us, and therefore it must be our plan.
3) Yay body shaming!  Your boobs are ugly!  I bet you’re just here because you think you’re thin!
4) Insulting “real” geek girls by implying that he thinks they’re ugly and fat.
5) This still doesn’t make sense.  So any woman he thinks is semi-attractive, but not model hot, is a fake geek girl SIMPLY because there’s no other reason she’d be there?  He can tell just because she falls into some definition of attractiveness for him that’s in the middle?
6) Maybe they’re in skimpy costumes because a lot of heroines in video games and comics are in skimpy costumes?  Even the ones who aren’t are in skin tight costumes.  If they were in non-accurate costumes, they’d probably be accused of being not real geeks because the costumes weren’t accurate.
7) More mind reading.  IT PISSES ME OFF THAT I AM SO SURE THAT THIS TERRIBLE THING IS THE THOUGHT PROCESS GOING THROUGH THEIR MIND AND THAT THEY SECRETLY WANT TO JUST FEEL LIKE A CHEERLEADER AROUND A BUNCH OF MALE GEEKS WHO HAVE NEVER TALKED TO A WOMAN BEFORE.  I KNOW IT.  Again, even if this were true of some people (women, *gasp* are not a homogenous group), he seems to “know” this only because he thinks the woman is semi-attractive to him.  And also, you can’t disprove his theory, since he’s already said if we talk to guys at cons, we’re just lying liars who lie, and would never do it outside, so that’s not even proof we’re just there to have fun.  I guess the only proof is he’d have to follow us home and make sure we’re sleeping with a guy he considers geeky enough to count to our cred?
8) Male geeks are apparently all the same, and they are completely pathetic lonely guys who need protection from evil geek girls who wear costumes.  Do male geeks actually like white knights like this guy “standing up” for them? -_-
9) Who cares even if people are in cons just to get attention?  People go to baseball games just to get attention and get on TV.  Are cons some sort of “pure” place now where people’s money to attend is only accepted if the purity of our soul is weighed against a roc feather to see if we’re true geeks?
10) Why does it matter how “geeky” one is anyway?  I thought these things were supposed to be fun.  Miss Martian is my favourite character and I cosplay her, but I have never seen the TV show.  I’ve read a few of the comics when she debuted.  Should I turn in my geek card?  I’ve been accused of being a “fake geek” SIMPLY for being Asian, because “Asian girls know white men want them”.  Should I strip off my skin now?
11) What’s wrong with wanting to feel attractive anyway?  Is he saying some women aren’t ALLOWED to feel attractive?  Only women who look like models are allowed?  This reminds me of a guy I knew in high school who literally said that any woman with stomach pudge shouldn’t be allowed to wear tight clothes.  Like government banned, because he felt that “fat” girls shouldn’t be allowed to feel sexy.
Nitpicking aside, I think the big issue here is how guys like Harris seem to think women exist entirely for men, and our entire world and thought process is all about them.  If I walk into a comic book store wearing clothes that they think make me attractive, I must be there to seduce them.  My hair must be done to attract them.  My glasses are probably a front to make me more of a sexy geek girl.  I’m Asian so I must be thinking “I’m a sexy exotic Asian girl lalalalala look at me boys!” constantly, and I can’t just be thinking “I wonder if they have All Hail Megatron in yet?”  If THEY like me, then everything I do has to be meant for them, and my thought process is all tailored to them. Because THEY want me, and THEY don’t feel they can “have” me, this is my fault.  I’m a temptress, I’m a Jezebel.
It’s very similar to other attitudes in which society views certain groups of people and their bodies.  Fat people are accused of flaunting their fatness to disgust others.  Gay couples are accused of “shoving” their sexuality in people’s faces simply for holding hands.  Trans people are accused of trying to “trap” cis people who are attracted to them.  (We can add this to the above scenario, where if a guy in a comic shop is attracted to me and finds out I’m trans, it’s my fault if he freaks out.)  How OTHER people react to our bodies is not something they are told to take responsibility for, instead we get told it’s OUR fault.  If a man assaults a woman, it’s her fault for what she wears.  If a guy at a con is bitter that he’s attracted to a girl who he’s afraid to talk to, it’s HER fault.  She MUST have known this, and MUST be trying to make him miserable.  If she talks to him she’s leading him on, if she ignores him, she’s being cruel to him.
Ultimately, I think this is really insulting to everybody.  Geek girls are all fakers who just want to be the sexy fish in the small pond, and we have active evil thoughts in our brain, and geek guys are all agency-less children who can’t have an attractive woman near them without having a brain aneurysm, and need Harris to protect them.  How about, people go to cons to have fun.  Some people go to get attention (including the guys), and good for them.  What’s wrong with that?  It’s a place where people can feel free to dress up in ways they normally could not.  Who cares their motivation?  If them being attractive to you bothers you, then stop looking at them.  Go do something else.  Talk to somebody else.  Go have fun, and let us have fun. :)

An excellent response to this BS.
Also: why is it that guys are never labeled ‘fake geeks’?  A non-comic-fan guy sees the Captain America movie and dresses up as Cap?  Awesome!  A girl sees “The Avengers” and dresses up as Black Widow?  Oh, she’s a fake, because she’s never read a comic in her life.  

Dear eschergirls: there are not enough “fuck yeahs” in the world to express how hard you nailed that.

Echergirls as said everything that I wanted, but more eloquently.

But to add to that, Tony Harris, my good sir, do not assume that you know what all geeks are thinking. I ask that your turn in your geek card because white knighting is not accepted here. And, being a douchebag to people that you don’t know isn’t accepted either, nor is you assuming that all people cosplay for attention and to be sexy or attractive :l

irisundone:

sushigrade:

kyrax2:

eschergirls:

thebirdandthebat:

Wow, I’m never buying anything Tony Harris does again. Disgusting.

(Ex Machina, Starman artist: his wikipedia page. Click the image to be taken to the Facebook thread where he posted this.)

Since somebody sent this to me, because it fits some of the themes this blog has touched on in the past, here are my thoughts:

1) I like how he thinks he’s stumbled upon our secret plan, and also that this is some sort of amazing new idea.  I’ve heard this accusation from my geek guy friends going back a decade.  The “you’re just there to get attention because you want to be the big fish in a small pond” accusation to femalef geeks they find attractive, is not new.

2) I like how he’s a mind reader.  Maybe it’s true of some girls, maybe it’s not, how do you know by looking at them?  The only thing you know is how YOU’RE attracted to us, and therefore it must be our plan.

3) Yay body shaming!  Your boobs are ugly!  I bet you’re just here because you think you’re thin!

4) Insulting “real” geek girls by implying that he thinks they’re ugly and fat.

5) This still doesn’t make sense.  So any woman he thinks is semi-attractive, but not model hot, is a fake geek girl SIMPLY because there’s no other reason she’d be there?  He can tell just because she falls into some definition of attractiveness for him that’s in the middle?

6) Maybe they’re in skimpy costumes because a lot of heroines in video games and comics are in skimpy costumes?  Even the ones who aren’t are in skin tight costumes.  If they were in non-accurate costumes, they’d probably be accused of being not real geeks because the costumes weren’t accurate.

7) More mind reading.  IT PISSES ME OFF THAT I AM SO SURE THAT THIS TERRIBLE THING IS THE THOUGHT PROCESS GOING THROUGH THEIR MIND AND THAT THEY SECRETLY WANT TO JUST FEEL LIKE A CHEERLEADER AROUND A BUNCH OF MALE GEEKS WHO HAVE NEVER TALKED TO A WOMAN BEFORE.  I KNOW IT.  Again, even if this were true of some people (women, *gasp* are not a homogenous group), he seems to “know” this only because he thinks the woman is semi-attractive to him.  And also, you can’t disprove his theory, since he’s already said if we talk to guys at cons, we’re just lying liars who lie, and would never do it outside, so that’s not even proof we’re just there to have fun.  I guess the only proof is he’d have to follow us home and make sure we’re sleeping with a guy he considers geeky enough to count to our cred?

8) Male geeks are apparently all the same, and they are completely pathetic lonely guys who need protection from evil geek girls who wear costumes.  Do male geeks actually like white knights like this guy “standing up” for them? -_-

9) Who cares even if people are in cons just to get attention?  People go to baseball games just to get attention and get on TV.  Are cons some sort of “pure” place now where people’s money to attend is only accepted if the purity of our soul is weighed against a roc feather to see if we’re true geeks?

10) Why does it matter how “geeky” one is anyway?  I thought these things were supposed to be fun.  Miss Martian is my favourite character and I cosplay her, but I have never seen the TV show.  I’ve read a few of the comics when she debuted.  Should I turn in my geek card?  I’ve been accused of being a “fake geek” SIMPLY for being Asian, because “Asian girls know white men want them”.  Should I strip off my skin now?

11) What’s wrong with wanting to feel attractive anyway?  Is he saying some women aren’t ALLOWED to feel attractive?  Only women who look like models are allowed?  This reminds me of a guy I knew in high school who literally said that any woman with stomach pudge shouldn’t be allowed to wear tight clothes.  Like government banned, because he felt that “fat” girls shouldn’t be allowed to feel sexy.

Nitpicking aside, I think the big issue here is how guys like Harris seem to think women exist entirely for men, and our entire world and thought process is all about them.  If I walk into a comic book store wearing clothes that they think make me attractive, I must be there to seduce them.  My hair must be done to attract them.  My glasses are probably a front to make me more of a sexy geek girl.  I’m Asian so I must be thinking “I’m a sexy exotic Asian girl lalalalala look at me boys!” constantly, and I can’t just be thinking “I wonder if they have All Hail Megatron in yet?”  If THEY like me, then everything I do has to be meant for them, and my thought process is all tailored to them. Because THEY want me, and THEY don’t feel they can “have” me, this is my fault.  I’m a temptress, I’m a Jezebel.

It’s very similar to other attitudes in which society views certain groups of people and their bodies.  Fat people are accused of flaunting their fatness to disgust others.  Gay couples are accused of “shoving” their sexuality in people’s faces simply for holding hands.  Trans people are accused of trying to “trap” cis people who are attracted to them.  (We can add this to the above scenario, where if a guy in a comic shop is attracted to me and finds out I’m trans, it’s my fault if he freaks out.)  How OTHER people react to our bodies is not something they are told to take responsibility for, instead we get told it’s OUR fault.  If a man assaults a woman, it’s her fault for what she wears.  If a guy at a con is bitter that he’s attracted to a girl who he’s afraid to talk to, it’s HER fault.  She MUST have known this, and MUST be trying to make him miserable.  If she talks to him she’s leading him on, if she ignores him, she’s being cruel to him.

Ultimately, I think this is really insulting to everybody.  Geek girls are all fakers who just want to be the sexy fish in the small pond, and we have active evil thoughts in our brain, and geek guys are all agency-less children who can’t have an attractive woman near them without having a brain aneurysm, and need Harris to protect them.  How about, people go to cons to have fun.  Some people go to get attention (including the guys), and good for them.  What’s wrong with that?  It’s a place where people can feel free to dress up in ways they normally could not.  Who cares their motivation?  If them being attractive to you bothers you, then stop looking at them.  Go do something else.  Talk to somebody else.  Go have fun, and let us have fun. :)

An excellent response to this BS.

Also: why is it that guys are never labeled ‘fake geeks’?  A non-comic-fan guy sees the Captain America movie and dresses up as Cap?  Awesome!  A girl sees “The Avengers” and dresses up as Black Widow?  Oh, she’s a fake, because she’s never read a comic in her life.  

Dear eschergirls: there are not enough “fuck yeahs” in the world to express how hard you nailed that.

Echergirls as said everything that I wanted, but more eloquently.

But to add to that, Tony Harris, my good sir, do not assume that you know what all geeks are thinking. I ask that your turn in your geek card because white knighting is not accepted here. And, being a douchebag to people that you don’t know isn’t accepted either, nor is you assuming that all people cosplay for attention and to be sexy or attractive :l


posted 1 year ago on 13/11/2012 with 11839 notes
via mysterychase © facebook.com
#I just... #so much hate for this man #picture #reblog
tokokomo:

kingsalty:

edwardspoonhands:

fishingboatproceeds:

dormauz:

The US Electoral map resized to represent the population of each state.

I’d just like to point out that Indiana is almost exactly the correct size.

Montana is not…Montana is tiny and insignificant and this makes me feel…odd.

aaaand there’s jersey, the most densely populated state, bloated as hell

rode island where are you

tokokomo:

kingsalty:

edwardspoonhands:

fishingboatproceeds:

dormauz:

The US Electoral map resized to represent the population of each state.

I’d just like to point out that Indiana is almost exactly the correct size.

Montana is not…Montana is tiny and insignificant and this makes me feel…odd.

aaaand there’s jersey, the most densely populated state, bloated as hell

rode island where are you


posted 1 year ago on 12/11/2012 with 6066 notes
via gabnats © dormauz
#reblog

and then i spent the next 10 hours on this website

irisundone:

herrbargeldsrisotto:

swimmingviolist:

thirdtimecharmed:

hushlittlesleipnir:

lokis-army-at-221b:

hotterhatter2211:

daaaaaaaaaaaaaaalek:

1victor:

chibibuizel:

ramblingeekette:

sherlockismyholmesboy:

WHY DID YOU POST THIS AS I GET INTO MY LECTURE

OH GOD WHY CAN’T STOP CLICKING

WOW LOOK WHERE IT TOOK ME

http://www.wwwdotcom.com/ oh

10000000% done rn

This one is my favorite:

http://www.something.com/

http://www.staggeringbeauty.com/

CHRIST

http://chickenonaraft.com/

http://hooooooooo.com/

omfg

http://heeeeeeeey.com/

look sarah I got the opposite

http://www.koalastothemax.com/

http://www.omfgdogs.com/

What even XD all of these sites are amazing :D


posted 1 year ago on 10/11/2012 with 11972 notes
via mysterychase © elicrotch
#ahhhh #links #link #reblog
fakedick:

sweetguts:

auwa:

stfusexists:

porcelain-horse-horselain:

theuppitynegras:

gaypocalypse:

egotisticalairhead:

swedens:

I love this image so much.
I’ve seen some women who are offended by this and say it’s ridiculous that her cleavage is showing and things of that sort.
Personally, I think it’s great.
Why should we have an image of a women with her hair tied up and flexing her muscles like she’s a man? (not that that isn’t great too!) In a way it suggests that when our hair is down, our breasts are visible and we wear (GASP) lipstick, we’re somehow lesser than men? We can do it! We can be feminine and successful.
You see what I’m saying here, ladies?
You don’t have to lose your femininity. Being feminine is great. Being masculine is great. Strength is not limited to one way of being.

Yes, thank you.
I never liked the one where she was all masculine, because that’s certainly not who I am. But it doesn’t mean I’m some weak being that can’t work hard.


“all masculine”


Long hair, boobs out and make up are awesome and all but in plane factory…not so much
“Okay, I have an idea for an update of the old Rosie the Riveter feminist icon.”
- “Oh? Sounds good, maybe a more inclusive series of pictures showing women with different body types and ethnici—”
“No, no, not like that. I was just thinking we could make her the same, just more feminine and pretty. Conventionally attractive white women are always getting shit on by the feminist movement.”
- “Uhm… wait—”
“Yup, okay, first let’s have her strong empowered facial expression changed to a sort of flirty, sultry gaze.”
- “But that’s—”
“Oh, and we definitely need to add some cleavage there too.”
-“WHAT?!”
“Okay, next lets forget the whole ‘strong arm’ thing and have her be fixing her hair.”
- “That is literally the opposite of—”
“Now let’s make her facial features more conventionally attractive and add some makeup!”
- “Wait… what the fuck? So basically it’s now JUST retro fashion pin-up of a white girl with an hourglass figure? Saying YES WE CAN… to fixing our hair and flirting?”
“Yeah, not ALL feminists hate bras and shaving, DUHHHHHH!!!!!!!! You should be a little more inclusive. Don’t discriminate against petite white cis girls!”


I reblogged this awesome thread from here because it was the only way I could get the formatting halfway decent. I found it through brashblacknonbeliever, and hellbentforleather had this to say about this image: 

FUCKING THANK YOU. this image is just sexualised bullshit. we all know that we can be feminist and feminine, this is pretty well established.“The image in question was created by Brazilian artist Will Murai, to accompany an article about ‘the end of feminism’ called ‘What do they Want?’ in the men’s magazine ‘Alfa.’The artist’s statement says:“This is an illustration I made for Alfa Magazine. This article talks about the end of feminism. The idea was to make the famous feminism symbol ‘Rosie The Riveter’ a ladie who is giving up on her duties and trying to look sexy again.””
EMPOWERING

All in all, the commentary on this trash is amazing. 

lol

WELP now that I know the context, yeah, fuck this picture.

I have too many followers reblogging this image with only the initial commentary who would otherwise not reblog it with several “^^^^THIS^^^^”s if they knew the origin and purpose of the image. So, here you go.

fakedick:

sweetguts:

auwa:

stfusexists:

porcelain-horse-horselain:

theuppitynegras:

gaypocalypse:

egotisticalairhead:

swedens:

I love this image so much.

I’ve seen some women who are offended by this and say it’s ridiculous that her cleavage is showing and things of that sort.

Personally, I think it’s great.

Why should we have an image of a women with her hair tied up and flexing her muscles like she’s a man? (not that that isn’t great too!) In a way it suggests that when our hair is down, our breasts are visible and we wear (GASP) lipstick, we’re somehow lesser than men? We can do it! We can be feminine and successful.

You see what I’m saying here, ladies?

You don’t have to lose your femininity. Being feminine is great. Being masculine is great. Strength is not limited to one way of being.

Yes, thank you.

I never liked the one where she was all masculine, because that’s certainly not who I am. But it doesn’t mean I’m some weak being that can’t work hard.

“all masculine”

Long hair, boobs out and make up are awesome and all but in plane factory…not so much

“Okay, I have an idea for an update of the old Rosie the Riveter feminist icon.”

- “Oh? Sounds good, maybe a more inclusive series of pictures showing women with different body types and ethnici—”

“No, no, not like that. I was just thinking we could make her the same, just more feminine and pretty. Conventionally attractive white women are always getting shit on by the feminist movement.”

- “Uhm… wait—”

“Yup, okay, first let’s have her strong empowered facial expression changed to a sort of flirty, sultry gaze.”

- “But that’s—”

“Oh, and we definitely need to add some cleavage there too.”

-“WHAT?!”

“Okay, next lets forget the whole ‘strong arm’ thing and have her be fixing her hair.”

- “That is literally the opposite of—”

“Now let’s make her facial features more conventionally attractive and add some makeup!”

- “Wait… what the fuck? So basically it’s now JUST retro fashion pin-up of a white girl with an hourglass figure? Saying YES WE CAN… to fixing our hair and flirting?

“Yeah, not ALL feminists hate bras and shaving, DUHHHHHH!!!!!!!! You should be a little more inclusive. Don’t discriminate against petite white cis girls!”

I reblogged this awesome thread from here because it was the only way I could get the formatting halfway decent. I found it through brashblacknonbeliever, and hellbentforleather had this to say about this image: 

FUCKING THANK YOU. this image is just sexualised bullshit. we all know that we can be feminist and feminine, this is pretty well established.

“The image in question was created by Brazilian artist Will Murai, to accompany an article about ‘the end of feminism’ called ‘What do they Want?’ in the men’s magazine ‘Alfa.’

The artist’s statement says:
“This is an illustration I made for Alfa Magazine. This article talks about the end of feminism. The idea was to make the famous feminism symbol ‘Rosie The Riveter’ a ladie who is giving up on her duties and trying to look sexy again.””

EMPOWERING

All in all, the commentary on this trash is amazing. 

lol

WELP now that I know the context, yeah, fuck this picture.

I have too many followers reblogging this image with only the initial commentary who would otherwise not reblog it with several “^^^^THIS^^^^”s if they knew the origin and purpose of the image. So, here you go.


posted 1 year ago on 1/11/2012 with 237472 notes
via fakedick
#reblog